Search for: "RICHARDSON v. DUKE" Results 1 - 20 of 26
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Dec 2012, 4:06 pm by The Recorder
The Impact Fund founder is perhaps best known for Dukes v. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 12:53 am by INFORRM
MP for Guildford, Angela Richardson asserted that “the university sector clearly needs to improve is understanding of how to use GDPR properly. [read post]
18 Nov 2018, 7:12 pm by Eugene Volokh
" See, e.g., 1 Samuel Richardson, Pamela: or, Virtue Rewarded 38 (2d ed. 1741) ("I hope he will let good Mrs. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 11:02 am by Bridget Crawford
Among the new members are these academics: CaliforniaColleen V. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 6:12 am
Rouhandeh, and Michael Kaplan, Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP, on Saturday, April 13, 2019 Tags: Bonds, Corporate fraud, DOJ, International governance, Misconduct, Rule 144, SEC, SEC enforcement, Securities litigation, Securities regulation, Volkswagen 2019 Proposed Amendments to DGCL Posted by John Mark Zeberkiewicz and Brigitte Fresco, Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A., on Saturday, April 13, 2019 Tags: Appraisal… [read post]
7 Feb 2021, 4:53 pm by INFORRM
The Statement in Open Court [pdf] in the case of Duke of Sussex v Associated Newspapers received wide coverage. [read post]
5 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm by Narintohn Luangrath
Hall notes that under the test Justice Gorsuch articulates in his Gundy v. [read post]
13 Jun 2021, 4:54 pm by INFORRM
, Singapore Journal of Legal Studies, Mar 2021, pp 6-18, Megan Richardson, University of Melbourne – Law School. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 1:00 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
Doron Dorfman, Syracuse University College of Law, Of Worthy and Worthier Blood: Gay Families, Anti-HIV Medication, and the Blood Ban Doriane Lambelet Coleman, Duke Law School, Legal Issues in Decision-making for Adolescents Who Seek Gender Affirming Care F. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 5:21 pm by Gene Quinn
Nym* (an anonymous contributor) Robert Plotkin Ron Reardon James Richardson Eric Steffe Roberto M. [read post]
31 May 2010, 11:57 am by law shucks
And when it’s former-associate v. firm, that’s all the more interesting. [read post]